Risk Analysis Discussion Group |
Moderation Policies
The moderation policies of this mailing list strive to achieve a compromise between those who would prefer a complete lack of moderation and those who would prefer a clear and firm set of rules to prevent any perceived abuses in posting behavior. They are designed to be light-handed and flexible, without sanctions except when posting behavior interferes with the intended functions of the list or causes members to disengage from the list. They may change when the membership agrees that change is needed.
The Risk Analysis Discussion Group encourages free interchange of ideas without censorship in order to:
Members have widely differing tolerance to perceived abuses in posting behavior and differing views of what constitutes abuse. Some of the behaviors that are irritating to some members and may cause them to disengage are:
The list will run more smoothly if complaints and decisions about violations of the moderation policies are few. If you find another member annoying, you may be able to deal with the problem by:
Moderator Actions
Although actions may be initiated by a moderator, most will begin with a member-initiated complaint. Complaints should be sent to the moderator at the address below, not to the list!
Recognizing that judging which posting behaviors deserve moderation is inherently subjective, actions will usually be applied in stages, but egregious behavior may result in accelerated action. Usually, the stages involve:
Stages 4 and 5, if contested, will be subject to review by an ad hoc committee recruited from the membership.
Members can file complaints or petition for a change in the moderation policy by contacting the administrator at the email address below.